India Today on MSN2d
What Supreme Court's verdict implies for property rights in IndiaCurbing government control over private property under Article 39(b) of the Constitution, the court ruled that not all ...
The bench said that extant rules having statutory force are binding on the recruiting bodies both in terms of procedure and ...
A nine-judge Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday in a majority verdict held that not all private resources of ...
Not all privately owned properties qualify as community resources that the State can take over for the common good, the ...
Versus State of Maharashtra, the apex court reversed its earlier ... Article 31-C was added to the Indian Constitution in ...
The decision arose from the case of Property Owners Association and Ors v State of Maharashtra and ... remains in force. In ...
The Supreme Court in April said the Constitution intended to bring about a 'sense of social transformation' and it would be ...
Live Mint on MSN1d
Not every private property can be acquired by state, rules Supreme CourtA nine-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the ... The majority opinion, authored by Chief ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that all private properties can't be considered "material resources of the community" under ...
Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud delivered a historic judgment rekindling the democratic spirit of Indian constitution.
The Times of India on MSN4h
Citizenship by birth to be curtailed by incoming US President Trump, will impact 1 million Indians in green card queueOne of the top priorities of Donald Trump, the incoming President of the United States of America (USA) is to end automatic ...
Why has a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court overturned the Allahabad High Court's judgment on the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004?
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback