India Today on MSN2d
What Supreme Court's verdict implies for property rights in IndiaCurbing government control over private property under Article 39(b) of the Constitution, the court ruled that not all ...
A nine-judge Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday in a majority verdict held that not all private resources of ...
Versus State of Maharashtra, the apex court reversed its earlier ... Article 31-C was added to the Indian Constitution in ...
Part 2 of the four-part series revisiting the question of dual citizenship in India in view of the Supreme Court judgment on ...
The decision arose from the case of Property Owners Association and Ors v State of Maharashtra and ... remains in force. In ...
Not all privately owned properties qualify as community resources that the State can take over for the common good, the ...
Live Mint on MSN1d
Not every private property can be acquired by state, rules Supreme CourtA nine-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the ... The majority opinion, authored by Chief ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that all private properties can't be considered "material resources of the community" under ...
The bench said that extant rules having statutory force are binding on the recruiting bodies both in terms of procedure and ...
The Supreme Court upheld the 2004 Uttar Pradesh Madarsa Education Act, ensuring minority rights and educational standards in ...
Why has a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court overturned the Allahabad High Court's judgment on the validity of the Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004?
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback