Versus State of Maharashtra, the apex court reversed its earlier ... Article 31-C was added to the Indian Constitution in ...
A nine-judge Constitution Bench has finally put a quietus to an issue pending in the courts for over three decades, striking a balance between public welfare and private property rights ...
Why has a three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court overturned the Allahabad High Court's judgment on the validity of the Uttar ...
Curbing government control over private property under Article 39(b) of the Constitution, the court ruled that not all ...
Live Mint on MSN2d
Not every private property can be acquired by state, rules Supreme CourtA nine-judge constitution bench of the Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled that the ... The majority opinion, authored by Chief ...
A nine-judge Constitutional bench of the Supreme Court on Monday in a majority verdict held that not all private resources of ...
The decision arose from the case of Property Owners Association and Ors v State of Maharashtra and ... remains in force. In ...
The Supreme Court on Tuesday (5 November) held that all private properties cannot be considered "material resources of the ...
The bench said that extant rules having statutory force are binding on the recruiting bodies both in terms of procedure and ...
Not all privately owned properties qualify as community resources that the State can take over for the common good, the ...
In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court ... if vacancies exist, the state or its instrumentality cannot arbitrarily deny ...
The Madarsa Act provides the legal framework for madarsa education where, apart from the curriculum of the NCERT, religious ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback