Dec 13, 2024 · court reviewed a Title VII {summary Judgment Ruling} that required Muldrow to show “materially significant disadvantage.” for a viable Job transfer claim based on Title VII protected activity. This Court decided Title VII lawsuits, claiming discriminatory job transfer based on a protected activity, with respect

supreme court of the united states boston parent coalition for academic excellence corp. v. the school committee for the city of boston, et al. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the first circuit

Jan 16, 2025 · Court's consistent precedent, including its Ashcroft decision, as Judge Higginbotham well explained in his dissent. This Court should begin by confirming that strict scrutiny continues to apply to any such content-based burden on websites and their adult users. Heritage Reporting Corporation

The Court finds unpersuasive the State’s argument that plaintiffs’ maps were not reasonably configured because they failed to keep to- gether the Gulf Coast region.

Jan 17, 2025 · IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _____ UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION, ET AL., PETITIONERS . v. STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. _____ INTERIM STORAGE PARTNERS, LLC, PETITIONER . v. STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL. _____ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. It is hereby certified that all parties required to be served …

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES R. Allen Stanford, Petitioner Ralph S. Janvey, et al Respondents On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit INDIVIDUAL APPLICATION TO JUSTICE SAMULEL A. ALITO PURSUANT TO SUPREME COUT RULE 22.1 PRESENTING REQUEST TO

Today at the Court - Sunday, Jan 26, 2025 The Supreme Court Building is closed on weekends and federal holidays. Courtroom Lectures available within the next 30 days.

The Court finds that the methodology, form, content, and dissemination of the Notice: (i) were implemented in accordance with the requirements of the Scheduling Order; (ii) constituted the best practicable notice; (iii) were reasonably calculated, under the

the Court has to decide whether there was a Fourth Amendment violation. But, in lay speech, "unreasonable" could go to whether the action was prudent, whether it was a violation of best police practices or the practices of a particular police department.

injunction. A court of equity may grant relief only to the parties before it. The district court violated that principle by issuing a universal injunction purporting to enjoin the Act itself and forbidding the enforcement of the Act even against non-parties. Several Members of this Court have recognized that such universal relief contradicts